Showing posts with label tragedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tragedy. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

The Bluest Eye: Toni Morrison

"Pecola Breedlove, a young black girl, prays every day for beauty.  Mocked by other children for the dark skin, curly hair, and brown eyes that set her apart, she yearns for the blond hair and blue eyes that she believes will allow her to finally fit in.  Yet as her dream grows more fervent, her life slowly starts to disintegrate in the face of adversity and strife.  A brilliant examination of our obsession with beauty and conformity, Toni Morrison's virtuosic first novel asks powerful questions about race, class, and gender with the subtlety and grace that have always characterized her writing."

You might have noticed that this is different from the other reviews I've been posting lately.  This was one of the assigned books for my graduate Topics in American Literature course I'm just finishing up (this is the last week!).  I ended up writing my final paper on this book by Morrison, and Langston Hughes' poem, "I, Too;" I used these works of American literature as evidence of continued oppression of African Americans.  I will be entirely honest and tell you that I have not cared for Morrison's writing in the past.  I struggled to "read" (when I say "read," I really mean "began to read with earnest and good intentions, then fought terribly to maintain interest, and then skimmed for important parts when I could no longer stomach it) "A Mercy" and "Tar Baby" during my undergraduate work.  (I actually went back and read my review of "A Mercy;" contrary to what I just wrote, it doesn't seem like I hated that book, though I did struggle through some very difficult portions from the point of view of Florens).  "The Bluest Eye," for me, was the easiest to read.  It was easier for me to fall into the story than with Morrison's other works I've read.  Also, this book was obviously interesting enough to me that I chose to use it as the basis of my final essay for the course.  As social, cultural, and historical commentary, I thought this book was moving and it really made me think more deeply about racism (even racism within a race, which is not something I'd considered before) than I had in the past.  I really love literature that makes me think (yes, I do enjoy more of a mental challenge than my typical romance novels...).  I feel like this book is yet another example of why Morrison is a Nobel Prize-winning author; she exposes new facets of African American life and makes us question our lives and history.  She confronts harsh issues that are difficult to stamen, but - at the same time - are extremely important and need to be discussed.  Pecola is a tragic character.  As Morrison writes in the book's forward (which I also saw turned into an afterward in another copy of the book), "I focused...on how something as grotesque as the demonization of an entire race could take root inside the most delicate member of society:  a child; the most vulnerable member:  a female" (Morrison xi).  Pecola is this personification, stemming from Morrison's own childhood conversation with a classmate when she was growing up in Loraine, Ohio.  That girl, too, wanted blue eyes.  Blue eyes were the personification of beauty; while anything seen as a traditionally "black trait" is ugly or undesirable.  It is heartbreaking when anyone hates themselves for something they cannot control, and this is part of what makes Morrison's work so powerful.

I do recommend this book.  It made me think and it touched me.

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Atonement: Ian McEwan


"Ian McEwan's symphonic novel of love and war, childhood and class, guilt and forgiveness combines all the satisfaction of a superb narrative with the provocation we have come to expect from this master of English prose.

"On a summer day in 1935, thirteen-year-old Briony Tallis witnesses the flirtation between her older sister, Cecilia, and Robbie Turner, the son of a servant.  But Briony's incomplete grasp of adult motives and her precocious imagination bring about a crime that will change all their lives, a crime whose repercussions Atonement follows through the chaos and carnage of World War II and into the close of the twentieth century."

Even though the start of the semester technically starts tomorrow I wanted to get a head start on the reading for my classes since I know I'm going to be completely swamped.  This particular book happened to be for my Modern Brit Lit course.  I saw the movie version of this book a few years ago.  It was a late-night Netflix pick (which was a bad idea because -- not only is it a long movie -- but holy cow!  I don't think I've ever cried so hard while watching a movie!)  Now, having read the book, I think the casting was done extremely well.  I definitely saw Keira Knightley as Cecilia and could definitely picture James McAvoy as Robbie (not to mention I think he's probably one of the most beautiful brooding men that exists).While there were a few tweaks here and there in the plot, I don't think they necessarily hindered the power of McEwan's story.

The book took me a bit longer to read than I thought it would.  I cruised through the first hundred-or-so pages, but I slowed quite a bit after that.  I don't want to give anything away, but it took about that long for the major development that I knew was coming to happen.  I don't know if the hinderance was because I knew what was going to happen since I'd already seen the film or if the book itself just slowed quite a bit.  Either way, I had a hard time getting through the enormously long first part of the book (which turned out to be about half of the book).  Once I got through there, the already eloquent writing really brought to life the horrors of war and the tragedy experienced by both individuals and entire countries during WWII.  The biggest thing I will take away from this story is the beauty of McEwan's writing style.  It was reminiscent of a hodge-podge of classical British writing-styles.  I sensed a bit of Austen, Woolf, and even a touch of Dickens.  The entire story had some seriously dark undertones and they definitely helped to generate interest in the plot and characters.  As I mentioned earlier, the book slowed a little bit in the middle, but I wonder if it wasn't because I already knew what was going to happen.  I have a feeling -- with its beautiful writing -- that I wouldn't have been able to put this book down if I'd not experienced the story before.

Overall, I thought the characters were vivid and rich.  I especially appreciated McEwan's technique of putting a story into a story -- as if we were reading the book that Briony wrote and was waiting to publish.  That, I felt, was a unique and very interesting literary decision.  I was moved by this powerful story and recommend it to anyone interested in classic British literature.  McEwan's writing was extremely enthralling and it was difficult not to become absorbed in the tragedy of her characters.

*I have a feeling I'll add more to this review when we discuss this book sometime during the semester.  Be on the lookout for an update!

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Hamlet: William Shakespeare


I've been DYING to read this play and I finally got to sit down and enjoy it. (Actually...that's a funny story. It was while I was still in school, enrolled in my Shakespeare course. We were assigned to read Macbeth, but--silly me!--somehow figured that I should read Hamlet instead... I must have gotten the messages crossed in my brain, thinking "Well...they both start with the main, angsty character's name, so why not switch one for the other?" *sigh* Anyway, about two acts into it, I realized what I was doing and had to get Macbeth instead. So, no harm done, but I couldn't wait to get to work and read Hamlet for real.)

It took me a bit, but I did read Hamlet and enjoyed it a lot. It wasn't the most riveting of Shakespeare's works that I've read, but I liked it nonetheless. Truly, I believe that Hamlet is a lot more complex than many people give him credit for. I don't actually think he was crazy at all--merely making everyone think he was so he could better get his revenge. Several lines (which I sadly do not have in front of me at this moment) made me believe this. See if you can pick them out!

This is also a really perfect book to read using Queer Theory (I highly recommend looking this up. It's SO interesting!).

Overall, the plot was fantastic and twisted. It was awesome to finally read the lines I've heard in pop culture for all of my life. Now, I can much better appreciate them.

While I was reading this play, a new version of Hamlet performed by the Royal Shakespearean Company came out. (Doctor Who fans, prepare to scream!) David Tennant plays Hamlet! I was thrilled to see him in this hardcore production. In fact, he puts many of the other actors to shame. It was really impressive to see. So, I very much so recommend watching this version! Hope you all enjoy the play as much as I did!

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

King Lear: William Shakespeare


I read this play back in my senior year of high school, so I was a little disappointed to see that we were reading it again in my Shakespeare class in sophomore year of college. I understand that our teacher was trying to give us as broad a look at his works as possible, but I know that LEAR is actually one of the more commonly-read works in senior year lit classes in this area.

I wasn't interested in reading this play again because it is just so sad! It was bad enough getting all depressed in high school, but I didn't want to do it all over again. Not to say that this play is bad--which it most certainly is not--but it was just something that I was not motivated to read once more.

When I did force myself to read it, however, I did see it slightly differently. Reading it with a little more maturity beneath my belt seemed to help. I was able to pick things out that I hadn't the first time and I think I appreciated it more. The language was easier to understand as well.

So, I recommend to everyone who's reluctant to read something once again later in their lives; at least give it a chance. I'm pleasantly surprised from my experience.

Macbeth: William Shakespeare


I've been dying to read this Shakespearean work and was so excited when I saw it on the syllabus for my Shakespeare class. I knew a little bit about it--thoughm bit really more than pop culture has main-streamed--and I was looking forward to learning more.

This play really dragged me in right from the beginning with the three witches. The TRUE supernatural wasn't something that I'd read much of in the other Shakespearean works I've read (well, other than THE TEMPEST). It was fascinating and attention-grabbing. Lady Macbeth was one of the most ruthless, cold-hearted female leads and I enjoyed watching her twisted mind work. However, I could actaully see the real love that she and Macbeth had for one another. Though ambition overtakes both of them, they don't seem to lose that caring. A running theme of this play is the proving of manhood. Though Lady Macbeth consistently criticizes her husband's "lackthereof", I still don't think that she stops loving him. This whole idea is something that I think it worth keeping an eye on throughout this play.

If you have a good copy of this play which details why Shakespeare added certain aspects and mentioned certain occurences that were going on during the period in which this was written; this will really add to your enjoyment of this work. If you don't have this, I highly suggest going out and putting effort into getting it--it's worth it.

Overall, I really liked this play. It was interesting and enjoyable, though tragic. In class, we watched part of one modern Australian version with AVATAR star Sam Worthington. Not a lot of people liked his acting (they already didn't care for him in AVATAR, which I actually disagree on), but I did. I thought, for what it was, it was a good version of Macbeth.